The heated debate and seemingly apparent dichotomy between human freedom which plays itself out in some erroneous conceptions of the autonomy of reason in our world today, and the demands of the moral law which is an expression of divine wisdom, formed the basis for the encyclical of the holy father. He would state quite clearly that the autonomy of human reason by which man expresses his freedom of choice in no way suggests that man is the creator of moral norms. Rather, it suggests that man has been endowed with the rational and practical capacities to do the good and avoid evil. Bestowed thus with these capacities, man expresses his fundamental freedom- something which is more foundational, deeper and divergent from the freedom of choice in particular-singular acts, in what is aptly called a fundamental option.
According to the new catholic encyclopedia, by
fundamental option is to be understood “the basic orientation of one’s moral
life as a continuous process with a definite moral direction rather than as a
sequence of discrete unconnected action.” The problem which such an
understanding poses is that the fundamental option is given direction by
singular acts, so that by particular acts, the fundamental option is either
expressed or modified, confirmed or contracts or is withdrawn from entirely. The
argument of moralists who purport the fundamental option, tends to obliterate
the responsibility of the human agent who acts. By mortal sin, the agent is
seriously and in fact actually involved in a definite sinful act.
Fundamental option carries with it the danger of
relegating freely chosen concrete behaviours to a merely physical and
psychological process and “not judging them according to the criteria proper to
human acts,” whereby the proper moral assessment of acts is left on the plane
of a fundamental option and the definitive actions are entirely or partially
dismissed from consideration. The holy father implicitly avers that the value
attributed to fundamental option has a definite worth when expressing the
ground for one’s entire commitment, nevertheless, the definite act itself
better describes the basic orientation of the individual in such wise that
implications of unique dramatic choices are avoided.
The holy father in the seventieth number of this
document avers; “even so, care will have to be taken not to reduce mortal sin
to an act of fundamental option…” By fundamental option, man makes a total and
free self-commitment to God. But when this fundamental option as an act of
faith becomes detached from the concrete choices which one makes, a monumental
danger sets in. Fundamental option, although ought to be seen as an eccentric
choice of freedom, which then connects that choice to specific acts, it is
nullified when man engages his freedom in gravely mortal acts. Now, because the
fundamental option understood as an intention alone devoid of concrete actions,
does not suffice for the assessment of the morality of acts, it falls short of
providing the criteria for judging mortal sins.
The church teaches that the three conditions of grave
matter, deliberate consent and full knowledge, must be fulfilled for a sin to
be mortal. Nevertheless, there are situations where, although the matter is a
grave one, but the sin is not termed mortal; this is due to the lack of any one
of the other two conditions. Although the above is a sound church teaching, we
must tread with caution not to lessen mortal sin to a mere act of fundamental
option. This poses the threat of becoming oblivious to freely and voluntarily
committing sins which are intrinsically mortal. The point here is that although
a sin may no longer be mortal because of the absence of either a deliberate
consent or full awareness, one should not give in to the temptation of lowering
mortal sin to the sphere of the workings of the mind wherein from a purely
psychological stance, one then manufactures a theological stand that casts
shadows on the true and catholic meaning of mortal sins. So that mortal sin exists when a person
voluntarily and knowingly chooses that action which is gravely disordered from
the commands of God.
Friar Emmanuel Igboekwulusi, OFM Cap.
You can drop your comments in the comments section below 👇
Nice one thank you for this beautiful piece .
ReplyDelete